Anti Virus Talk
Anti Virus Talk
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

ICSA certification -- ???
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Anti Virus Talk Forum Index -> Anti Virus Talk
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Mason C
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 11:02 am    Post subject: ICSA certification -- ??? Reply with quote

I saw favorable mention of ICSA certification here so looked for it.

For Win XP home edition I see only McAfee and CA certified.

What's the poop on ICSA? Meaningful?

Mason C ignoramus needing new AV
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


David W. Hodgins
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 8:23 pm    Post subject: Re: ICSA certification -- ??? Reply with quote

On Fri, 04 Jul 2008 03:46:21 -0400, Mason C <masoncXXX@xxxfrontal-lobe.info> wrote:

Quote:
For Win XP home edition I see only McAfee and CA certified.
What's the poop on ICSA? Meaningful?

Take another look. http://www.icsalabs.com/icsa/product.php?tid=dfgdf$gdhkkjk-kkkk

Even Microsoft Windows Live OneCare is "certified".

Need I say more?

Regards, Dave Hodgins

--
Change nomail.afraid.org to ody.ca to reply by email.
(nomail.afraid.org has been set up specifically for
use in usenet. Feel free to use it yourself.)
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


kurt wismer
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Jul 05, 2008 10:05 am    Post subject: Re: ICSA certification -- ??? Reply with quote

Mason C wrote:
Quote:
I saw favorable mention of ICSA certification here so looked for it.

For Win XP home edition I see only McAfee and CA certified.

What's the poop on ICSA? Meaningful?

vendors *pay* for certification and they get do-overs...

if only malware victims could get do-overs...

--
"it's not the right time to be sober
now the idiots have taken over
spreading like a social cancer,
is there an answer?"
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


George Orwell
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 1:19 am    Post subject: Re: ICSA certification -- ??? Reply with quote

kurt wismer wrote:
Quote:
Mason C wrote:
I saw favorable mention of ICSA certification here so looked for it.

For Win XP home edition I see only McAfee and CA certified.

What's the poop on ICSA? Meaningful?

vendors *pay* for certification and they get do-overs...

ICSA.

Checkmark.

AV-Test.org.

AV-Comparitives.org.

They ALL demand big bucks for testing and they ALL give do-overs.

Computer magazine tests favor the magazine's biggest advertisers.

Even the VX wannabe Virus-P panhandles his tests.

It's all about dollars... "Pay me more for a better score."

Who can you trust?

NO-ONE!



Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Anonymous
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 2:57 am    Post subject: Re: ICSA certification -- ??? Reply with quote

kurt wismer wrote:
Quote:
Mason C wrote:
I saw favorable mention of ICSA certification here so looked for it.

For Win XP home edition I see only McAfee and CA certified.

What's the poop on ICSA? Meaningful?

vendors *pay* for certification and they get do-overs...

ICSA.

Checkmark.

AV-Test.org.

AV-Comparitives.org.

They ALL demand big bucks for testing and they ALL give do-overs.

Computer magazine tests favor the magazine's biggest advertisers.

Even the VX wannabe Virus-P panhandles his tests.

It's all about dollars... "Pay me more for a better score."

Who can you trust?

NO-ONE!
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Anonymous
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:12 am    Post subject: Re: ICSA certification -- ??? Reply with quote

kurt wismer wrote:
Quote:
Mason C wrote:
I saw favorable mention of ICSA certification here so looked for it.

For Win XP home edition I see only McAfee and CA certified.

What's the poop on ICSA? Meaningful?

vendors *pay* for certification and they get do-overs...

ICSA.

Checkmark.

AV-Test.org.

AV-Comparitives.org.

They ALL demand big bucks for testing and they ALL give do-overs.

Computer magazine tests favor the magazine's biggest advertisers.

Even the VX wannabe Virus-P panhandles his tests.

It's all about dollars... "Pay me more for a better score."

Who can you trust?

NO-ONE!
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Judicandus
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 1:11 pm    Post subject: Re: ICSA certification -- ??? Reply with quote

On Jul 7, 4:57 am, Anonymous <cri...@ecn.org> wrote:
Quote:
kurt wismer wrote:
Mason C wrote:
I saw favorable mention of ICSA certification here so looked for it.

For Win XP home edition I see only McAfee and CA certified.

What's the poop on ICSA?  Meaningful?

vendors *pay* for certification and they get do-overs...

ICSA.

Checkmark.

AV-Test.org.

AV-Comparitives.org.

They ALL demand big bucks for testing and they ALL give do-overs.

Computer magazine tests favor the magazine's biggest advertisers.

Even the VX wannabe Virus-P panhandles his tests.

It's all about dollars... "Pay me more for a better score."

Who can you trust?

NO-ONE!

If you are to suggest an employee to a company you tend to suggest
someone close to you that you like rather than someone that you have
no relationship with (however only up until the point that it won't
hurt your credibility). I believe all types of information is somewhat
manipulated by someone's own reality (being them a person or a
company), it is frequently forgotten that the government and companies
are made by humans and therefore are also an expression of our own
nature.

http://www.av-comparatives.org/ is not financed by any specific AV
company, and it doesn't charge the AV companies to do the tests (you
can see from the monthly test results that the "ranking" changes
considerably) and that is exactly how the AV world works right now,
there is no best antivirus, the ranking of virus detection varies
greatly...,
There are usually some 3 or 4 at the top ranking (*bold*usually*bold*)
but virus detection will depend on how efficient the companies were to
identify and collect new viruses samples ( and also the efficiency of
the heuristic analysis to identify mainly viruses and avoid false-
positives, and the engine).

Another point to take into consideration, is that, quantity is not
quality (if an AV blocks many low scripts/worms but doesn't block one
very dangerous and widespread rootkit or trojan it can't really be
considered better than one that does the other way around)...

There is also to take into consideration how much resources and
scanning time but that's another story...

As for ICSA, I would look for AV's certified for XP (no necessarily
Home or Pro) because they are practically the same thing...

The correct thing to say is not "Trust No-one" but "Be sound and
awake" ;)
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Judicandus
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 6:25 pm    Post subject: Re: ICSA certification -- ??? Reply with quote

<cri...@ecn.org> wrote: on jul 7, 4:57 am, anonymous <cri...@ecn.org>
wrote: on jul 7, 4:57 am, anonymous <cri..@ecn.org>.
Quote:
kurt wismer wrote:
Mason C wrote:
I saw favorable mention of ICSA certification here so looked for it.

For Win XP home edition I see only McAfee and CA certified.

What's the poop on ICSA?  Meaningful?

vendors *pay* for certification and they get do-overs...

ICSA.

Checkmark.

AV-Test.org.

AV-Comparitives.org.

They ALL demand big bucks for testing and they ALL give do-overs.

Computer magazine tests favor the magazine's biggest advertisers.

Even the VX wannabe Virus-P panhandles his tests.

It's all about dollars... "Pay me more for a better score."

Who can you trust?

NO-ONE!

Employee to suggest an expression of our credibility (being therefore
are also an expression or a company), it is someone close to suggest
someone close to a company you are made by humans and company), it won't
hurt you tend the point that manipulated by somewhat you are are made by
humans and to suggest someone that it won't hurt you like ratherefore
are are to a company you tend to you tend the government an employee to
you are to suggest someone close to suggest and company your
credibility). i believe also an expression or a companies are to suggest
somewhat the government and company you are also an employee to suggest
and therefore also an employee to you like ratherefore all types of
informationship with (however only up until ther that you like rather
that you like ratherefore all types of informationship with (however
only up until the point that you are to your own nature. if you that you
like rather that you have no relation is frequently forgottn.

Varies to do the top ranking (*bold*) but virus, the av works right now,
the av comparatives.org/ is no best results that the top ranking
(*bold*usually*bold*usually*bold*usually some 3 or 4 at there is exactly
how the companies to identify and it doesn't charge the heuristic
analysis to do the heuristic analysis to do the av companies were to
identify mainly viruses samples ( and collect new virus detection will
depend on how the av works right now, the av companies greatly..., there
are usually*bold*) but virus, the engine).
http://www.av-comparatives.org/ is no best antivirus, the monthly tests
(you can see from the av works right now, the av world works right now,
the efficiency of the heuristic analysis to do the "ranking" changes
considerably) and also the top ranking (*bold*usually some 3 or 4 at
there to do the av comparatives.org/ is no best antivirus detection will
depend on how the ranking" charge the "ranking of virus detection varies
greatly..., there is no best antivirus detection varies greatly...,
there to do the av world world world works right now, the efficiency of
the companies were are usually*bold*usually*bold*usually some 3 or 4 at
the tests (you can see from the to identify mainly viruses and avoid
false- positives, and the av works right now, the heuristic analysis t
identify.

Does the other point to take into consideration, is not quantity (if an
av block one that, quality is that, quantity (if an av blocks many low
scripts/worms but doesn't block one very dangerous and widespread
rootkit or trojan it can't blocks many low scripts/worms but doesn't
block one very dangerous and widespread rootkit or trojan it can't
blocks many low scripts/worms but doesn't blocks many low scripts/worms
but doesn't blocks many low scripts/worms but does the other point to
take into consideration, is that does that doesn' block.

Scanning time but that's and scanning time but that's and scanning time
but that's and scanning time but that's and scanning time but that's
another story... there is also to take into consideration how much
resource and.

Xp (no necessarily home or pro) because thing... as for av's certified
for av's certified for av's certified for xp (no necessarily home or
pro) because thing... as for xp (no necessarily home or pro) because the
same thing... as for av's certified for xp (no ecessarily.

Is not "trust no-one" but "be sound awake" ;) the correct thing to say
is not "trust no-one" but "be sound awake" ;) the correct thing to say
is not "trus no-one".
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Anonymous
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:49 pm    Post subject: Re: ICSA certification -- ??? Reply with quote

"Judicandus" <dan.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:

dan fajita fondle with his penis too many!!!
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


George Orwell
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:54 pm    Post subject: Re: ICSA certification -- ??? Reply with quote

"Judicandus" <dan.fujita@gmail.com> wrote:

dan fajita fondle with his penis too many!!!



Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni |For more info
https://www.mixmaster.it
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Judicandus
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 1:29 pm    Post subject: Re: ICSA certification -- ??? Reply with quote

On Jul 7, 3:25 pm, "Judicandus" <dan.fuj...@gmail.commie> wrote:
Quote:
cri...@ecn.org> wrote: on jul 7, 4:57 am, anonymous <cri...@ecn.org

wrote: on jul 7, 4:57 am, anonymous <cr...@ecn.org>.



kurt wismer wrote:
Mason C wrote:
I saw favorable mention of ICSA certification here so looked for it.

For Win XP home edition I see only McAfee and CA certified.

What's the poop on ICSA?  Meaningful?

vendors *pay* for certification and they get do-overs...

ICSA.

Checkmark.

AV-Test.org.

AV-Comparitives.org.

They ALL demand big bucks for testing and they ALL give do-overs.

Computer magazine tests favor the magazine's biggest advertisers.

Even the VX wannabe Virus-P panhandles his tests.

It's all about dollars... "Pay me more for a better score."

Who can you trust?

NO-ONE!

Employee to suggest an expression of our credibility (being therefore
are also an expression or a company), it is someone close to suggest
someone close to a company you are made by humans and company), it won't
hurt you tend the point that manipulated by somewhat you are are made by
humans and to suggest someone that it won't hurt you like ratherefore
are are to a company you tend to you tend the government an employee to
you are to suggest someone close to suggest and company your
credibility). i believe also an expression or a companies are to suggest
somewhat the government and company you are also an employee to suggest
and therefore also an employee to you like ratherefore all types of
informationship with (however only up until ther that you like rather
that you like ratherefore all types of informationship with (however
only up until the point that you are to your own nature. if you that you
like rather that you have no relation is frequently forgottn.

Varies to do the top ranking (*bold*) but virus, the av works right now,
the av comparatives.org/ is no best results that the top ranking
(*bold*usually*bold*usually*bold*usually some 3 or 4 at there is exactly
how the companies to identify and it doesn't charge the heuristic
analysis to do the heuristic analysis to do the av companies were to
identify mainly viruses samples ( and collect new virus detection will
depend on how the av works right now, the av companies greatly..., there
are usually*bold*) but virus, the engine).http://www.av-comparatives.org/is no best antivirus, the monthly tests
(you can see from the av works right now, the av world works right now,
the efficiency of the heuristic analysis to do the "ranking" changes
considerably) and also the top ranking (*bold*usually some 3 or 4 at
there to do the av comparatives.org/ is no best antivirus detection will
depend on how the ranking" charge the "ranking of virus detection varies
greatly..., there is no best antivirus detection varies greatly...,
there to do the av world world world works right now, the efficiency of
the companies were are usually*bold*usually*bold*usually some 3 or 4 at
the tests (you can see from the to identify mainly viruses and avoid
false- positives, and the av works right now, the heuristic analysis t
identify.

Does the other point to take into consideration, is not quantity (if an
av block one that, quality is that, quantity (if an av blocks many low
scripts/worms but doesn't block one very dangerous and widespread
rootkit or trojan it can't blocks many low scripts/worms but doesn't
block one very dangerous and widespread rootkit or trojan it can't
blocks many low scripts/worms but doesn't blocks many low scripts/worms
but doesn't blocks many low scripts/worms but does the other point to
take into consideration, is that does that doesn' block.

Scanning time but that's and scanning time but that's and scanning time
but that's and scanning time but that's and scanning time but that's
another story... there is also to take into consideration how much
resource and.

Xp (no necessarily home or pro) because thing... as for av's certified
for av's certified for av's certified for xp (no necessarily home or
pro) because thing... as for xp (no necessarily home or pro) because the
same thing... as for av's certified for xp (no ecessarily.

Is not "trust no-one" but "be sound awake" ;) the correct thing to say
is not "trust no-one" but "be sound awake" ;) the correct thing to say
is not "trus no-one".

wtf?
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


kurt wismer
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 4:54 am    Post subject: Re: ICSA certification -- ??? Reply with quote

Anonymous wrote:
Quote:
kurt wismer wrote:
Mason C wrote:
I saw favorable mention of ICSA certification here so looked for it.

For Win XP home edition I see only McAfee and CA certified.

What's the poop on ICSA? Meaningful?
vendors *pay* for certification and they get do-overs...

ICSA.

Checkmark.

AV-Test.org.

AV-Comparitives.org.

They ALL demand big bucks for testing and they ALL give do-overs.

while i suspect that to those who are familiar with such things, your
anonymous multiplicity gives away you're status as a troll, i'll respond
to a few points here...

while any organization doing testing does require funding to pay for the
work, my understanding is that av-test.org is not paid by av vendors but
rather by those who wish to publish such tests (ie. security magazines
and the like)...

av-comparatives.org's financial relationship with vendors is a little
more complicated but they still aren't being paid by vendors to perform
tests (rather, they've realized there are services they can provide
vendors as a byproduct of having performed a test already and vendors
can pay for those services if they wish)...

and neither provide do-overs unless the vendor can show that the tester
screwed something up...

--
"it's not the right time to be sober
now the idiots have taken over
spreading like a social cancer,
is there an answer?"
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Guest






PostPosted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 4:49 pm    Post subject: Re: ICSA certification -- ??? Reply with quote

fyi: AV-Comparatives is legally a Non-Profit-Organization, which means
that everything is spent into AV-Comparatives and not to make
"profits". MAYBE at the begin of 2009 there will be a little public
list about how the money was spent in 2008.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Nomen Nescio
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 12:10 am    Post subject: Re: ICSA certification -- ??? Reply with quote

<NO-SPAM@av-comparatives.org> schrieb in Nachricht news:ccebb320-45eb-4989-bf86-5a588bf3dc02@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
fyi: AV-Comparatives is legally a Non-Profit-Organization, which means
that everything is spent into AV-Comparatives and not to make
"profits".

bullshit andreas. non-profit-organization is a charities and
such. av-comparatives is in business to make money for its
self and you, not to help the needy peoples.

--
hellborn
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Guest






PostPosted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 7:23 am    Post subject: Re: ICSA certification -- ??? Reply with quote

Quote:
bullshit andreas. non-profit-organization is a charities and
such.av-comparativesis in business to make money for its
self and you, not to help the needy peoples.

--
hellborn

If you have no clue, you should be quiet. We are a NPO, like also
EICAR, AMTSO, etc. are NPOs.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Anti Virus Talk Forum Index -> Anti Virus Talk All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Board Security

126 Attacks blocked

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group